Can Multiverse Really Exist?
On the nature of memory, censorship and what's the connection between Apple Vision and Alzheimer's disease.
Multiverse already exists. It has been in existence all time.
It’s the alpha and the omega of quantum physics, as well as with the mechanism of human cognition: the fact that what we call 'reality' is a derivative of ‘collapsing the wave function' together with memory.
When one omits ‘memory’ as an integral value of the equation, you have prevented it from collapsing the wave function to said reality.
Once one has prevented the collapsing of the wave function into said reality, they can collapse it into any other reality from the spectrum of realities.
I like to remind that everything we see and create in our imagination, exists. That is, it can be realized as a reality and/or as an object.
Conversely, if we cannot visualize something, either the information does not exist or we are prevented from accessing that type of information.
120 years ago it was unthinkable to believe that our voice could be transported far away, or that a block of metal weighing 350 tons could be suspended in air.
Today, these go without saying.
The world of matter comes from the world of 'nothing' ('spirit' in esoteric language. In the language of physics: vacuum / zero-point energy).
So on this fabric, in terms of potential, all possibilities exist.
If you had a conversion device, and let's say that device could access that zero-point field, you'd see exactly the 'hologram deck', showed so brilliantly in Star-Trek: the ability to load a program as a virtual reality.
What we see right now applied in the world of technology, such as Meta-verse and Apple Vision, through which one can exist in a virtual reality, as well as ideas presented in fictional films that showcase the same subject matter in myriad fashions, as well as the direction in which artificial intelligence is going towards, - all of them actually symbolize the direction consciousness, the universe and the planet and everything on it, are moving towards.
This consciousness speaks about the fact that everything can be realized as a reality, including what was revered as unreal. Additionally, not only can it be manifested as a visual reality, but also as a three-dimensional form. In other words, not just a hologram of an apple, but the apple itself, felt, and smelt by all our senses.
But in order to reach such a state, something else that "interferes" is being taken away:
Memory.
A little about memory
Memory is an interesting thing, but largely misunderstood.
Memory works in a sophisticated way and can be destructive to one's psyche and wellbeing if one doesn’t understand the basic underlying mechanism that stands behind it, and the pitfalls inherent.
If I may be provocative, there is no absolute truth in memory. In fact, there’s no such thing as an absolute truth but that of an individual existence. Everything we call 'truth' is only a relative truth: the memory we collectively agree on about how things were.
As long as we say "yesterday", yesterday happened. But in reality, we don't know.
Did I confuse you?!
Well, that's the nature of memory. It’s the very thing that gives us the illusion of past. And as soon as there is a past, a future is created as a counterpoint.
Every person observes a phenomenon differently as a byproduct of them observing it from a different angle, literally. As a result, each person imprints the impression in derived from the experience uniquely in their memory; in a slightly different way than everyone else.
And because the human memory is built in such a way that it weaves a memory as a series of still images within the brain, in the very act of reminiscing, a considerable portion of these still images disappears, while others become disordered.
Then, by the time an experience is recalled, the memory comes out in such a way that it can never be one-to-one as the experience itself. It's like when you ask a couple how they met, and after each of them is done with their version you wonder if they actually met.
Every time we remember something, we automatically censor which detail will come to the forefront and which will be pushed back to the “end of the deck”, depending on the situation that required the recall of the memory.
And we do it subconsciously. When I ask a couple how they met, and I do that when they are at a celebratory event, retrieving the details and from memory will be completely different than when they are asked the same question under a police investigation.
Memory can definitely be something empowering on one level, but limiting on another.
Memory is also a buffer; a borderline. If today I met you and we happened to sit down to talk over a cup of tea, the next day you would no longer see me as a stranger, and so for the rest of your life (as long as this memory exists).
If one has an unpleasant experience, the memory will be etched, along with the mood attached to it, felt at the moment the experience took place. Recalling the memory later in time will also bring out the same feeling or "taste of spirit”.
In fact, everything we know as ourselves is a product of a memory stored within us, which to a large extent is not directly accessible but plays out in its own way, through us (i.e. Karma).
Memory is also closely related to cultural identity. Every year we have dates where we remember shared past experiences. And the very fact that we create a routine of recalling these memories reestablishes and cement our identity as a unique "tribe", different than the ”tribe” on the other side of the valley.
When it comes to our history as a human species, which is but a collection of stories (History = His Story) - if we go a tad deeper, we discover that we can never really know how things were precisely, simply because the collective memory is a byproduct of individual, personal memories collected aggregated and preserved over time.
And since, as we saw earlier, because each memory is the byproduct of a unique point of view, some of them are omitted from the “national archive” - the collective memory of a society - because they do not "fit" the national direction, traditions and values.
On the same hand, as we saw earlier, recalling memories as the telling of stories, never reflects the experience itself due the way they’re weaved together, along with circumstances and conditions that call for their remembering, creates a slightly different story.
This is why the more sophisticated we’ve become, in the way we collect and store information, the more versatility we have in the way we present historical events. New versions of human history emerge as ways of presenting different memories, coupled with the fact that each time we recall them creates a slightly different story.
Until 50 years ago, Columbus was perceived as a national hero. Today he is considered a rapist and a murderer in the eyes of many.
From the point of view of the Egyptians, they won the Six Day War against Israel. For Israel, the opposite is the truth.
So who won, and is Columbus a hero or a criminal?!
The healthy and correct answer to these and other questions is: all the above or none of them, depending how one want to look at it. In truth, it doesn't make a difference.
Perhaps, then, the coin drops that there is no such thing as one absolute collective truth, but only a relative one: the collection of memories that society has chosen to agree on how things were.
All these memories connect us together. However, the complete identification with them is also what can confuse and alienate one from themselves.
This is why movies, documentaries and news can never be an accurate representation of history and reality. And yet, they serve as an important contribution to the development of our collective intelligence.
In other words, the story that is not considered factual is as important as the story that is. Because the added value lies in the story itself and not necessarily whether it is true or not. As we are exposed to greater variety of perspectives; the more different ways we have of seeing things, the greater our cognitive potential is enhanced.
All that, of course, assuming that the person understands the underlying mechanism of memory and can see it for what it is.
Endless exclusive realities
One of the important things to see happening in our world right now is that the line between 'truth' and 'false' is fading.
All the dividing boundaries that have been etched in our minds over the years between what is real and what is not, what is worthy and what is not, are disappearing.
Not only do they fade away, they switch places.
And this confuses people.
As we’ve seen, the information overload - the growing collection of human memories from all time - along with the ability to access it in a split second through our technological solutions, provide us with new ways to create slightly different stories.
But over time, the line between the "slightly different" stories and the original ones fades.
We have reached a reality in which the information bubble is so dense and filled with so many details, that entire books can be written explaining why the Holocaust never happened. And not only do they explain why it could have never happened, it is possible to add evidence; details and photographs that create concrete explanations to the point where even the greatest Holocaust expert will begin to question everything he thought he knew about the validity of it.
If we take it a few steps further, when we add Artificial Intelligence that enables any end user to create video content, just as it can currently create with still images, such as with the engines like: Midjourney and Dall-E, and we add to the equation a period in the future not far from now, in which all the generation of World War II and their children are no longer living, we arrive to an unprecedented, surreal existence in which these two types of realities can be presented side by side, and both of them will be true just as much as they can be false.
No one will be able to really know what’s the real reality and what isn’t anymore. In essence, they will become one.
Why do you think the whole world is panicking about "dis” and “mis-information"?!
Because the collective memory; the relative truth that we were conditioned to assimilate as an absolute one, disappears. And so there’s a backlash response to preserve the relative truth as an absolute, depending on the angle.
“We won the second World War!”
"That's the truth. This is how it was!”
Now, from a bird's eye view, this is the direction consciousness is going. This is a necessary step in order to enable such consciousness.
Imagine a creature who would be able to connect and pull out any possibility from the endless web of possibilities, regardless of whether it happened in a concrete way or not, and from then on, extrapolate all the resulting derivatives of how things would have looked like, and therefore, be able to construct a completely different reality as a potential program.
So if we go back to the Nazis example, we’re talking about the ability to access any hypothetical situation, in the aforementioned case, to extrapolate derivative events resulting from the National Socialist German Workers' Party not rising to power.
It also shows us that once such a web of information can be accessed, without fixation or identification with any particular memory, there is no more past and future. They merge.
If I can be abstract, it is about the ability to mix information in a dimension that is higher than human’s and therefore not accessible to it on a conscious level.
What I’m trying to show is that, that which is responsible in our biology to differentiate between reality and imagination fades away. This thing, whether it is genetic information, as instructions within the DNA molecule, or biological buffers such as blood composition, PH levels, and blood-brain-barrier, to name few, are metamorphosing .
Why do you think Alzheimer's disease and dementia are only increasing among the human population, where its prevalence encompasses younger ages each year?! This is a derivative of the loss of memory in the human species to ultimately allow "multiverse consciousness".
Imagine a being that has no memory, but when it needs to realize a particular reality out of all viable possibilities, or be able to know what's going on in every nook and cranny of this planet, all it has to do is access the collective memory fabric. Therefore, it would no longer needs its own personal memory.
It will not be effective.
Maybe then, you can also understand why mental illnesses and all kinds of emotional imbalances are on the rise and are becoming quite extreme in their manifestation. It’s because the "boundary line” is breaking down within us. Then, fragmentation ensues between body and spirit, well within the individual human.
And yet, without the diminishment the boundary line, it’s not possible to move forward and realize the new "feature", if you catch my drift.
Epilogue:
We live in times where all of us experience some variation of identity crisis. People have a hard time letting go, no matter what memory they hold onto.
On the personal level, there’s a central conviction that it’s necessary to find what really happened to us and what’s the meaning behind this and that past experience: “why my mother did this and my father said that…” along with the emotional baggage attached to them.
But as we’ve seen, it is only a memory. And by virtue of its mechanism it can never reflect how things were.
Precisely now, perhaps, in times of confusion and misunderstandings, this can serve as a good reminder why it’s important to create a space between us and our memories, and simply see them as they are: memories.
Nothing less, nothing more.
To free ourselves from the meanings and biases we have placed on them unconsciously, which in retrospect have shaped our beliefs and our (false) identity.