Fascinating summary of the evolution of consciousness, communication and the collective knowledge or collective consciousness ie the Maia.
You talk about transcending the Maia. By this do you mean that the burden of the Maia has become too great and has stopped us seeing the wood for the trees so to speak? Don’t we still need the Maia? Do you mean we need to transcend to a more spiritual understanding – to a more abstract understanding?
I have always believed that there is another ‘information highway’. I am not sure how to explain it but it seems to me that there is something akin to a wavelength which can be tuned into and which can endow an ability to bring about the most incredible connections between us. An example as I am stumbling for words: we were touring Europe on a motorbike and randomly drove to Germany. We had a friend in Germany who lived in Cologne. I had no idea of her address but my husband suggested we go to Cologne to see if we could find her. It was the summer holiday. We knew she was studying at the university so figured our best shot was to go to the uni and see if anyone there knew her. We went in -hardly any students were there, no-one knew her, so we were on the verge of giving up. As we started to walk out there was our friend, Gabi, walking in. She said earlier that day she had a strong impulse to go to the university library for no reason she could understand. She said she had not visited the library for 3 months but that day she knew she had to go. And there we were in front of the library. It is not just one experience like that we have had many.
However, you talk as if you want us collectively to transcend the Maia – do you think that is possible? Do you think enough people are capable of abstract thought or a more spiritual outlook? It seems to me that only a small percentage of people are.
One other point - you said that mental memory is inexistent in any other bioform but I am not sure that this is the case. I understand that dogs, for example, live 'in the moment' and perceive the environment completely differently to us humans but surely they must have some kind of mental memory which stops them repeating past mistakes and keeps them from harm?
------------> Since there's a limitation to the number of words a comment can contain ( I believe it's about 1600) I have divided them into two comments by which I answer all your questions.
-------------
Good questions.
Well, first, the main premise of this post is to be able to detail and frame what the Maia is: A byproduct of a self-reflected consciousness. So now when I say 'Maia', you know exactly what that means.
So first, the main premise is to show that the topic is not reserved only to the "upper echelon club" of quantum physicists, but a topic that everyone can understand regardless of preconceived conditions and circumstances.
Second, by understanding that this is not a complex one, the imperative in which this mechanism should be taught to children at an early age so that they know.
That’s the basis.
Then we can move on to the next steps, - all kinds of questions, like yours, which are very good questions, that arise as a result.
And herein lies your answer: if the Maia is a byproduct of a self-reflected agency (i.e. the mind), then the goal is not to fight it, control it or cancel it because otherwise, that would be equivalent to getting a lobotomy. Something I don't recommend.
The ancients, in their variations of cultures and traditions, used to depict the duality that exists in Man, as the duality between the governing agency and the conception agency. This is akin to the difference between the lower navel area - referred to as the lower Dāntián (in Chinese tradition) or Sacral center (in Hindu Brahmin tradition), and between the mind respectively. These are the Yin and Yang intertwined as a quantum in one body: The Garden of Eden which holds both the Tree of life and the Tree of knowledge respectively.
The mind’s function is to see. Nothing less, nothing more. And in seeing, duality emerges as this and that. But the moment the conception agency assumes it’s the governing agency, life becomes distorted. At that moment, full identification with the Maia emerges and that’s where suffering ensues as a byproduct.
In other words, we are not here to fight the Maia, the Maia is a beautiful thing. It really is. But it is a beautiful thing if one knows how to see it for what it is. It is a horror, otherwise, when one doesn’t; when there’s absolute identification with it, since the governing agency has become the mind.
This is where one of Jesus’ infamous quotes comes to mind: Be in the world but not of the world.
What he meant was that we are here to be part of the Maia, but not identified with it.
Think of it like a movie, because it is a movie. Your personal movie. No one can see what you see. No one can get into your personal “box”. When you watch some film on TV, you watch and participate with the character's journey; the highs and the lows. You even shed a tear here and there, you get upset, you laugh, but overall it’s entertainment. You don’t personalize it, you’re not totally absorbed in it or get stuck with baggage after the movie is over. Otherwise you’d never be able to watch any other film.
Our lives are the same. Each one of us has a particular, unique movie. And the question is how do we interact with that movie. Are we fully absorbed in it, turning anything in it to subjectivity through which everything becomes personal, or do we create space between the drama and learn to see it for what it is. The trap is that it's not something one does. One can only strip their mind and turn it back to its intended role by beginning to reinvigorate the connection to the true and only governing agency.
When one is totally identified with the mind, as both the inner and outer authority, they are bound to never be able to get rid of subjectivity. It’s just a mechanism. This is not spiritual. The mind can never be both the inner and outer authority. When it does, there’s a short-circuit by which it begins to lie.
Because at that moment the mind will always coax the individual to take one direction or another, or to say a certain thing and omit another in order to produce what it sees as the desired result or to give it an advantage in relation to what it wants to achieve.
This is the basic mechanism why we don't have honest communication at all in our consciousness. There is no such thing. Every form of communication has an agenda that 'runs' beneath it. In fact, what we call 'truth' can only be a relative truth. And it comes from this mechanism: what happens when the mind has become both the inner and outer authority in life.
When one is no longer using their minds for decision-making, however, only then can they speak their truth for the first time, since the mind has been stripped from the ordeal of being preoccupied with control; how and what needs to be said.
Only then it’s free to see. Then the gifts of mind can shine through. Then we begin to see uniqueness. We begin to see people seeing the Maia uniquely and sharing it with the collective. This is the premise: we're here to enrich the Maia with our unique way of filtering the information filed, because each and everyone of us is unique.
This is how we come full circle: We started our exchange by my comment about the spike protein as a false narrative. Well, if I can quantify that, this is probably 25% correct. And this is the only thing we have.
But we need many more perspectives. It's essential to be able to accurately understand the Maia and in understanding, enhance it. On the other hand, as mentioned in the post, we don't take out those explanations that are no longer viable from the Maia because again, we don't have that many voices for uniqueness who can point out to us what is essential and what’s sterile.
So we're left usually with two main binary paradigms, usually contradicting one another, on any topic, by which we streamline everyone to see the same thing. And of course what happens is that instead of a discovery, what we get is a homogeneous experience: a hundred people saying the same thing and essentially having the same experience. It adds nothing to the collective knowledge. It adds nothing to the collective consciousness.
.
.
--------------
Question about: "I have always believed that there is another ‘information highway’......"
--------------
This is somewhat connected to the above.
The ruling agency, your body’s consciousness, is a quantum computer that is much superior to the serial computer (the mind). But because human beings have not been educated to fully trust or make the connection to the governing agency in their day to day, it usually comes out inconsistently, here and there, to which they allude it as something extraordinary or paranormal. But it isn’t extraordinary. It’s mundane. Imagine if this process was natural - something of the ordinary - trusted and done without thinking by more and more people, just as one does not think about breathing?!
When one fully commits to navigating their life by the body’s agency, the mind no longer intervenes in trying to control the life, because there is a separate process that takes care of the doing. At that moment, the mind is free to do its number. It’s free to observe the process and in the observing lies the expansion of consciousness.
It also becomes free NOT TO KNOW, which is the greatest freedom of all. You have to understand that In this particular stage of our development and the development of the Maia, we have become relatively ignorant about it. It’s so dense, especially nowadays in which the information load has long surpassed the mind’s ability to process.
What that means is that in our times, it is absolutely dangerous because the mind - as an assumed controller of the Life - becomes terribly afraid and anxious.
We are approaching a reality in which our collective agreements in the Maia to what is considered ‘truth’ and what is considered ‘lie’ are merging. Everything that we have come to know and trust as concrete truths is falling apart. And since the human mind is not able to discern between what's true and what's false, there’s anxiety that begins to possess everyone. As a result, the more the mind is confused, anxious and afraid, the more it tries to control its destiny.
And control is a form of homogenization.
The fear of uncertainty, driving the mind to be obsessed with control, is then projected outward by trying to control others. And in order to control others, there’s an attempt to control the information load: what type of information is allowed and what isn’t. And so, there’s a battle to control the collective direction. A battle to reach a critical mass; to uphold the “one truth” from which to inculcate everyone with.
This Is what we're seeing now occurring all over the world as the battle against and for censorship and free speech. What that means is that those who will continue to be dependent on their mind for decision making, they are bound to suffer greatly.
This is one of the things I watch all the time around me. So many are losing their life because they’re caught in a crusade to know (usually things that are not important to know or think about) because they think that by knowing the answer to something will give them the right direction, love, truth, whatever the case may be, whereas in reality they lose their sanity on their way to get there. All, because we have reached a time in which it is not possible to know anyway. The Maia has become so dense, especially now with technology.
But if the mind has been stripped of its power to control the life; if it’s no longer in charge and there’s a different process that is occupied with the navigation, then not knowing becomes ok.
Question about: "However, you talk as if you want us collectively to transcend the Maia – do you think that is possible? Do you think enough people are capable of abstract thought or a more spiritual outlook? It seems to me that only a small percentage of people are."
-------------
This is not about collective transcendence. It is not about reaching critical mass. It’s about the individual. The only revolution is individual one. The individual has to awaken to themselves.
It’s not about abstract or logic either, as which is better. Each one of us is designed to see the world in a differently. Some of us are abstract thinkers, others are logical. Some are intuitive-reasoned others are intuitive-emotional. The goal, if there was one, is to enhance whatever is one's unique differentiated cognition, rather than homogenize everyone to one rule-set.
According to what I know, we're right on the verge of a great shift and turmoil. Some of us feel it already but they don’t know exactly what that means. The global cycle we’re entering into is a cycle in which the only certainty is that nothing is certain. And so, what that means is that the only way to transcend the confusion and chaos is by acquaintance with the governing center for the decision making and releasing the mind from preoccupation with control.
.
.
----------------
Question about: "One other point - you said that mental memory is inexistent in any other bioform but I am not sure that this is the case. I understand that dogs, for example, live 'in the moment' and perceive the environment completely differently to us humans but surely they must have some kind of mental memory which stops them repeating past mistakes and keeps them from harm?"
-----------------
It seems we have a very limited understanding about the nature of memory. Since we are so identified with our minds, we tend to believe that memory is only a function of the brain. But the reality is that we have several memory processes that are entirely different from one another.
We have a mental conscious memory. We have storage memory - the deep gray area of our brain - in which we store every impression of our lives, we have autobiographical memory and we have cellular and muscle memory.
For instance, cellular memory stores habitual and repetitive processes impressed in our bodies. You don't think about every step you take when you walk, do you?! This is done automatically due to the cellular/ muscle memory that contains the acquired information from childhood.
Any other bioform has their Maia too. It’s just that it's a very different Maia. Their ‘movie’ is completely different from ours. In mammals, the predominant memory is a cellular memory that works subconsciously and drives all their physical abilities intended for survival purposes. They work in three main streams of: instincts, pattern recognition and intuition.
And so, dogs do have a memory, but it is not a mental memory that can be accessed consciously. Dogs experience the world through tonal sounds and layered density of aroma (smells). They're able to smell and distinguish between 50,000 types of aromas in one sniff. This ability to differentiate between so many variations of aroma is then stored within their cellular memory, which enhances their instinctual system. That’s how they build their Maia.
.
.
I hope I've made this clear rather than complex. Indeed, it’s a fascinating topic and I thank you for probing it by commenting and asking some very good questions.
Hello David - I have been absent for a couple of weeks and only just now skimmed your comments - I can see that I will need to read through all this properly and take some time to make sure I truly understand what you are saying. In thinking about this task I was reminded about having deep conversations with friends in my youth about the meaning and purpose of life etc and I remember us debating the impossibility of truly knowing if the other party interpreted the words received with the same meaning which the speaker attached to them. In other words how did our unique personal experiences colour the interpretation of words themselves and what barriers did that cause to our communication?
Fascinating summary of the evolution of consciousness, communication and the collective knowledge or collective consciousness ie the Maia.
You talk about transcending the Maia. By this do you mean that the burden of the Maia has become too great and has stopped us seeing the wood for the trees so to speak? Don’t we still need the Maia? Do you mean we need to transcend to a more spiritual understanding – to a more abstract understanding?
I have always believed that there is another ‘information highway’. I am not sure how to explain it but it seems to me that there is something akin to a wavelength which can be tuned into and which can endow an ability to bring about the most incredible connections between us. An example as I am stumbling for words: we were touring Europe on a motorbike and randomly drove to Germany. We had a friend in Germany who lived in Cologne. I had no idea of her address but my husband suggested we go to Cologne to see if we could find her. It was the summer holiday. We knew she was studying at the university so figured our best shot was to go to the uni and see if anyone there knew her. We went in -hardly any students were there, no-one knew her, so we were on the verge of giving up. As we started to walk out there was our friend, Gabi, walking in. She said earlier that day she had a strong impulse to go to the university library for no reason she could understand. She said she had not visited the library for 3 months but that day she knew she had to go. And there we were in front of the library. It is not just one experience like that we have had many.
However, you talk as if you want us collectively to transcend the Maia – do you think that is possible? Do you think enough people are capable of abstract thought or a more spiritual outlook? It seems to me that only a small percentage of people are.
One other point - you said that mental memory is inexistent in any other bioform but I am not sure that this is the case. I understand that dogs, for example, live 'in the moment' and perceive the environment completely differently to us humans but surely they must have some kind of mental memory which stops them repeating past mistakes and keeps them from harm?
1/2
------------> Since there's a limitation to the number of words a comment can contain ( I believe it's about 1600) I have divided them into two comments by which I answer all your questions.
-------------
Good questions.
Well, first, the main premise of this post is to be able to detail and frame what the Maia is: A byproduct of a self-reflected consciousness. So now when I say 'Maia', you know exactly what that means.
So first, the main premise is to show that the topic is not reserved only to the "upper echelon club" of quantum physicists, but a topic that everyone can understand regardless of preconceived conditions and circumstances.
Second, by understanding that this is not a complex one, the imperative in which this mechanism should be taught to children at an early age so that they know.
That’s the basis.
Then we can move on to the next steps, - all kinds of questions, like yours, which are very good questions, that arise as a result.
And herein lies your answer: if the Maia is a byproduct of a self-reflected agency (i.e. the mind), then the goal is not to fight it, control it or cancel it because otherwise, that would be equivalent to getting a lobotomy. Something I don't recommend.
The ancients, in their variations of cultures and traditions, used to depict the duality that exists in Man, as the duality between the governing agency and the conception agency. This is akin to the difference between the lower navel area - referred to as the lower Dāntián (in Chinese tradition) or Sacral center (in Hindu Brahmin tradition), and between the mind respectively. These are the Yin and Yang intertwined as a quantum in one body: The Garden of Eden which holds both the Tree of life and the Tree of knowledge respectively.
The mind’s function is to see. Nothing less, nothing more. And in seeing, duality emerges as this and that. But the moment the conception agency assumes it’s the governing agency, life becomes distorted. At that moment, full identification with the Maia emerges and that’s where suffering ensues as a byproduct.
In other words, we are not here to fight the Maia, the Maia is a beautiful thing. It really is. But it is a beautiful thing if one knows how to see it for what it is. It is a horror, otherwise, when one doesn’t; when there’s absolute identification with it, since the governing agency has become the mind.
This is where one of Jesus’ infamous quotes comes to mind: Be in the world but not of the world.
What he meant was that we are here to be part of the Maia, but not identified with it.
Think of it like a movie, because it is a movie. Your personal movie. No one can see what you see. No one can get into your personal “box”. When you watch some film on TV, you watch and participate with the character's journey; the highs and the lows. You even shed a tear here and there, you get upset, you laugh, but overall it’s entertainment. You don’t personalize it, you’re not totally absorbed in it or get stuck with baggage after the movie is over. Otherwise you’d never be able to watch any other film.
Our lives are the same. Each one of us has a particular, unique movie. And the question is how do we interact with that movie. Are we fully absorbed in it, turning anything in it to subjectivity through which everything becomes personal, or do we create space between the drama and learn to see it for what it is. The trap is that it's not something one does. One can only strip their mind and turn it back to its intended role by beginning to reinvigorate the connection to the true and only governing agency.
When one is totally identified with the mind, as both the inner and outer authority, they are bound to never be able to get rid of subjectivity. It’s just a mechanism. This is not spiritual. The mind can never be both the inner and outer authority. When it does, there’s a short-circuit by which it begins to lie.
Because at that moment the mind will always coax the individual to take one direction or another, or to say a certain thing and omit another in order to produce what it sees as the desired result or to give it an advantage in relation to what it wants to achieve.
This is the basic mechanism why we don't have honest communication at all in our consciousness. There is no such thing. Every form of communication has an agenda that 'runs' beneath it. In fact, what we call 'truth' can only be a relative truth. And it comes from this mechanism: what happens when the mind has become both the inner and outer authority in life.
When one is no longer using their minds for decision-making, however, only then can they speak their truth for the first time, since the mind has been stripped from the ordeal of being preoccupied with control; how and what needs to be said.
Only then it’s free to see. Then the gifts of mind can shine through. Then we begin to see uniqueness. We begin to see people seeing the Maia uniquely and sharing it with the collective. This is the premise: we're here to enrich the Maia with our unique way of filtering the information filed, because each and everyone of us is unique.
This is how we come full circle: We started our exchange by my comment about the spike protein as a false narrative. Well, if I can quantify that, this is probably 25% correct. And this is the only thing we have.
But we need many more perspectives. It's essential to be able to accurately understand the Maia and in understanding, enhance it. On the other hand, as mentioned in the post, we don't take out those explanations that are no longer viable from the Maia because again, we don't have that many voices for uniqueness who can point out to us what is essential and what’s sterile.
So we're left usually with two main binary paradigms, usually contradicting one another, on any topic, by which we streamline everyone to see the same thing. And of course what happens is that instead of a discovery, what we get is a homogeneous experience: a hundred people saying the same thing and essentially having the same experience. It adds nothing to the collective knowledge. It adds nothing to the collective consciousness.
.
.
--------------
Question about: "I have always believed that there is another ‘information highway’......"
--------------
This is somewhat connected to the above.
The ruling agency, your body’s consciousness, is a quantum computer that is much superior to the serial computer (the mind). But because human beings have not been educated to fully trust or make the connection to the governing agency in their day to day, it usually comes out inconsistently, here and there, to which they allude it as something extraordinary or paranormal. But it isn’t extraordinary. It’s mundane. Imagine if this process was natural - something of the ordinary - trusted and done without thinking by more and more people, just as one does not think about breathing?!
When one fully commits to navigating their life by the body’s agency, the mind no longer intervenes in trying to control the life, because there is a separate process that takes care of the doing. At that moment, the mind is free to do its number. It’s free to observe the process and in the observing lies the expansion of consciousness.
It also becomes free NOT TO KNOW, which is the greatest freedom of all. You have to understand that In this particular stage of our development and the development of the Maia, we have become relatively ignorant about it. It’s so dense, especially nowadays in which the information load has long surpassed the mind’s ability to process.
What that means is that in our times, it is absolutely dangerous because the mind - as an assumed controller of the Life - becomes terribly afraid and anxious.
We are approaching a reality in which our collective agreements in the Maia to what is considered ‘truth’ and what is considered ‘lie’ are merging. Everything that we have come to know and trust as concrete truths is falling apart. And since the human mind is not able to discern between what's true and what's false, there’s anxiety that begins to possess everyone. As a result, the more the mind is confused, anxious and afraid, the more it tries to control its destiny.
And control is a form of homogenization.
The fear of uncertainty, driving the mind to be obsessed with control, is then projected outward by trying to control others. And in order to control others, there’s an attempt to control the information load: what type of information is allowed and what isn’t. And so, there’s a battle to control the collective direction. A battle to reach a critical mass; to uphold the “one truth” from which to inculcate everyone with.
This Is what we're seeing now occurring all over the world as the battle against and for censorship and free speech. What that means is that those who will continue to be dependent on their mind for decision making, they are bound to suffer greatly.
This is one of the things I watch all the time around me. So many are losing their life because they’re caught in a crusade to know (usually things that are not important to know or think about) because they think that by knowing the answer to something will give them the right direction, love, truth, whatever the case may be, whereas in reality they lose their sanity on their way to get there. All, because we have reached a time in which it is not possible to know anyway. The Maia has become so dense, especially now with technology.
But if the mind has been stripped of its power to control the life; if it’s no longer in charge and there’s a different process that is occupied with the navigation, then not knowing becomes ok.
(I have written all about this in this post of mine: The Borderline Between Truth and False is Disintegrating - https://open.substack.com/pub/kingofhearts/p/the-borderline-between-truth-and?r=1mikue&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web)
2/2
-------------
Question about: "However, you talk as if you want us collectively to transcend the Maia – do you think that is possible? Do you think enough people are capable of abstract thought or a more spiritual outlook? It seems to me that only a small percentage of people are."
-------------
This is not about collective transcendence. It is not about reaching critical mass. It’s about the individual. The only revolution is individual one. The individual has to awaken to themselves.
It’s not about abstract or logic either, as which is better. Each one of us is designed to see the world in a differently. Some of us are abstract thinkers, others are logical. Some are intuitive-reasoned others are intuitive-emotional. The goal, if there was one, is to enhance whatever is one's unique differentiated cognition, rather than homogenize everyone to one rule-set.
According to what I know, we're right on the verge of a great shift and turmoil. Some of us feel it already but they don’t know exactly what that means. The global cycle we’re entering into is a cycle in which the only certainty is that nothing is certain. And so, what that means is that the only way to transcend the confusion and chaos is by acquaintance with the governing center for the decision making and releasing the mind from preoccupation with control.
.
.
----------------
Question about: "One other point - you said that mental memory is inexistent in any other bioform but I am not sure that this is the case. I understand that dogs, for example, live 'in the moment' and perceive the environment completely differently to us humans but surely they must have some kind of mental memory which stops them repeating past mistakes and keeps them from harm?"
-----------------
It seems we have a very limited understanding about the nature of memory. Since we are so identified with our minds, we tend to believe that memory is only a function of the brain. But the reality is that we have several memory processes that are entirely different from one another.
We have a mental conscious memory. We have storage memory - the deep gray area of our brain - in which we store every impression of our lives, we have autobiographical memory and we have cellular and muscle memory.
For instance, cellular memory stores habitual and repetitive processes impressed in our bodies. You don't think about every step you take when you walk, do you?! This is done automatically due to the cellular/ muscle memory that contains the acquired information from childhood.
Any other bioform has their Maia too. It’s just that it's a very different Maia. Their ‘movie’ is completely different from ours. In mammals, the predominant memory is a cellular memory that works subconsciously and drives all their physical abilities intended for survival purposes. They work in three main streams of: instincts, pattern recognition and intuition.
And so, dogs do have a memory, but it is not a mental memory that can be accessed consciously. Dogs experience the world through tonal sounds and layered density of aroma (smells). They're able to smell and distinguish between 50,000 types of aromas in one sniff. This ability to differentiate between so many variations of aroma is then stored within their cellular memory, which enhances their instinctual system. That’s how they build their Maia.
.
.
I hope I've made this clear rather than complex. Indeed, it’s a fascinating topic and I thank you for probing it by commenting and asking some very good questions.
Hello David - I have been absent for a couple of weeks and only just now skimmed your comments - I can see that I will need to read through all this properly and take some time to make sure I truly understand what you are saying. In thinking about this task I was reminded about having deep conversations with friends in my youth about the meaning and purpose of life etc and I remember us debating the impossibility of truly knowing if the other party interpreted the words received with the same meaning which the speaker attached to them. In other words how did our unique personal experiences colour the interpretation of words themselves and what barriers did that cause to our communication?