The Cellular Deception: Introduction

This series explores how the Germ Theory has shaped our relationship with health, disease, and reality itself—and proposes a more holistic understanding aligned with nature's true principles.

Until now, I've written a lot on the invalidity of the Germ Theory, each time from a different angle and in relation to a subject matter. But for a long time, I've wanted to connect all the individual parts into a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts. I've wanted to write a full thesis that looks at the phenomena from several different angles.

Many before me have successfully debunked the theory. Yet they came from within the system or from within the paradigm, so to speak. In my case, I'm an outsider. I lack formal education and I don't come from within the system, which to me is an advantage because I'm not mentally conditioned. Moreover, I come from an experiential path. I have accidentally "bumped" into the invalidity of the Germ Theory through my own personal experience with unexpected illness.

And so for several years now I've been waiting for the moment when I could connect everything into a kind of meaningful and comprehensive presentation in a way that is accessible to anyone - in a way that is not bound to scientific jargon, endless citations from scientific studies but to common sense.

In this series, I will challenge one of medicine's most fundamental paradigms and demonstrate why its flawed foundations have led to far-reaching consequences for human health and society.

The Forgotten Questions of Simple Observation

It always fascinated me how come when I throw a banana peel into the garbage on a summer day, the next day I see a dozen fruit flies. How come it doesn't happen when the temperature is cooler? Why doesn't it happen on a fall or winter day?

How come when we throw organic waste into a container, seal it, and then come back a few days later, we see a whole ecosystem at play—potpourri of every microcosmic life you can imagine; from mold to beetles, worms and flies of all kinds. Just like the banana peel thrown into the bin, you wonder where all this life came from? After all it’s not that the compost was akin to a soil. The waste was sealed inside a container. 

How come two people eat the same food and one of them will have worms in their intestines while the other will not?! I remember when we asked this question when I was a kid we were told that there were microscopic eggs on the food. Supposedly this is the case, why one person would get the worms while the other would not?!

This is not new. For centuries scientists tried to find a definite answer to this question. There was a hypothesis that controlled the scientific circles for centuries that talked about 'spontaneous generation' - that life sprang out spontaneously.

But, me personally - I have begun to ponder these questions in particularly to my own personal experience. I would have never imagined that years later I would become entangled in what, in my opinion, is one of the greatest deceptions in human history. I would have never imagined it would be one of the most important callings in my life.

When Personal Experience Contradicts Scientific Doctrine

These fundamental questions about life's origins took on new urgency when I faced my own health crisis.

See, when I got ill with this neurology / muscle weakness / chronic disease, to which I have had no choice but to oftentimes call it "Lyme disease" in order to create a sense of familiarity in the reader (even though I don't subscribe to the naming, since it's totally inaccurate precisely because the label is a derivative of the Germ Theory paradigm), over the course of a few years, from the onset of the symptoms, I managed to predict with great accuracy the formation of Long Covid, long before any scientific authority. Eight months later I predicted the chronic illnesses and severe debilitations that would ensue as the result of mass vaccination.

But as my prediction became reality I faced a new dilemma. As my illness was propagated by so-called 'bacterial infection', Covid was a viral illness. I confronted a conflict: How come that these two vastly different entities - according to the definitions by modern science - generated the same results?

In other words, I predicted the same symptoms I have experienced, clustered as "Chronic Lyme Disease", on people who haven't been bitten by a tick, but by having succumbed to so-called "ACE-2 receptor spike-protein from SARS-CoV-2", which, according to current epidemiological paradigm, comes from airborne droplets that have jumped from a pangolin / bat in some food market in Wuhan or have been leaked from a Wuhan lab.

And so that has thrown me off completely.

By the time I got ill I was already heavily invested in studying the Human Design System, as well as living it. Soon enough it became clear to me that this was a unified field theory. That it was perhaps the most valuable thing for humanity that ever came from the cosmic chute.

Besides my investment in the study of the individual Human Design, I became enamored by the fact that the messenger for this knowledge, in his encounter with the mystical experience that years later led to the advent of the system, - beyond receiving the design of the human bioenergetic vehicle, - had received the bioenergetic design of all other life forms. That established continuity which I believe was lost in our scientific knowledge; the loss of our connection to the principles of nature, the progression of life and the true nature of evolution of consciousness in form.

This framework of understanding would prove crucial when I confronted the contradictions in mainstream medical explanations of disease.

After being tackled with the dilemma between viral and bacterial "infection" causing the same outcome, I stumbled one day on an online comment that insinuated on the invalidity of the virology paradigm. This became a bread crumb that eventually led me to the recognition of the Terrain Theory and the history surrounding it. And so, already somewhat familiar with the concept of life progression through the Human Design System, the theory seemed much more faithful to universal principles that govern nature.

There's a thing called 'triangulation' in science. It's where a combination of different sources for measurements create more confidence in reaching a definitive conclusion. So for me, having known the bioenergetic design of all other life forms, including the inanimate and the singular cell, and how they both have have a role in the universal orchestration of life, represented a different source that established triangulation. It therefore strengthened the validity of the Terrain Theory, as well as the Human Design System, on one hand, and exposed further the vast inconsistencies and gaps within the Germ Theory, on the other.

From that moment on it was a definite moment for me: There can no longer be any doubt about the invalidity of the Germ Theory. It was simply not aligned with the principles of Nature. And as a committed experiential scientist, if the underlying pattern is incorrect the paradigm emanating out of it must be dismantled.

Paradigms: The Invisible Architecture of Thought

But why does challenging this particular theory matter so much? Why should anyone care if one scientific theory is incorrect?

The stakes extend far beyond academic debate. Proving the invalidity of the Germ Theory is paramount because it shapes almost every aspect of modern healthcare and our relationship with our bodies. Moreover, as I will show, the adherence to this theory extends far beyond health. It destructively controls and shapes our economy, societal behavior and human psychology and as such, it leaves human society more vulnerable than ever and unprepared for the mutative transition that is coming.

As I've been analyzing the consequences of our pandemic response over the years, I've recognized that this isn't merely about correcting a scientific error—it's about understanding a fundamental principle about the mechanics of belief and how deeply it influences our lives.

A paradigm transcends mere ideas—it's a conceptual framework that fundamentally shapes reality. Just as architectural blueprints determine every phase of physical construction, a paradigm determine all human derivatives that flow from them: behavioral patterns, thought structures, social organization, educational frameworks, healthcare systems, economic models, and more.

Consider this—we pass down far more than biological traits. Alongside our DNA, we inherit "cultural DNA"—concepts etched into our cellular memory that guide our behavior at an unconscious level. Each new generation inherits the accumulated concepts of preceding generations, as relearning everything from scratch would be impossible.

Conversely, when concepts escape critical scrutiny, they become profoundly dangerous. Without generational examination, these concepts become embedded in our cellular memory, unconsciously directing our habits and behaviors. They form the foundation for false belief systems that eventually calcify into "truths." To illustrate that fundamental principle I'll share with you a recent experience I've had with a periodontist.

A Dentist's Brief Awakening

A few weeks ago I was sitting in a periodontist's chair, discussing the extraction of a troublesome molar. The dentist, examining my X-rays, expressed concern about bacteria from the adjacent tooth, declaring that I may need to extract it as well.

"You have this old filling area from which bacteria can slip out, causing infection to your adjacent wisdom tooth."

"Right," I interjected, "according to the Germ Theory."

He looked up, puzzled. "How do you mean?"

"Well, bacteria are not sentient, right?" I asked.

"Right," he nodded.

"So if they're not sentient, they can't be strategic."

He paused. "What do you mean by sentient?"

"They are not aware. Bacteria are not aware, let alone viruses, which are even more primitive."

"Right. They're more primitive. Bacteria is a full cell," he acknowledged.

"So if they are not aware, they cannot be strategic." I continued. "It's actually the other way around. They are the effect, not the cause."

A moment of silence followed as he stared at my X-rays. Then he turned back to me.

"I understand now where you're coming from. That's completely viable... You just blew my mind. I have to think about it. We're being taught at school to see bacteria as the enemy."

"That's correct," I replied. "And they teach you to see bacteria as the enemy because modern science needs a culprit. If there's no culprit, it could have never been able to substantiate itself as for-profit 'science'."

This exchange revealed something fundamental about how paradigm shifts occur. The conventional wisdom says that changing someone's mind is simply a matter of presenting better information or more compelling arguments.

However, as the dentist experience showed, the opportunity for change doesn't depend primarily on the quality of one's arguments or the depth of one's knowledge. but depends on serendipity - that rare moment when someone's guard is down, when they're capable of seeing beyond their training, when a small seed of doubt can take root in fertile ground.

This dentist—highly educated, successful, and thoroughly trained in the conventional medical paradigm—had his perspective shifted not through hours of debate or mountains of data, but through a simple logical observation offered at precisely the right moment, where he was receptive for being mutated.

Now, not that it held for long, and that was perhaps as interesting to watch, no better than the paradigm shift itself. Upon completion the procedure, half an hour later, I could see the dentist returning back to the 'auto-pilot' mode in which he simply uttered the normal, automated exclamation of: "don't forget to take antibiotics for at least a week to make sure you're healing correctly…we don’t want any bacterial infection."

This brief glimpse into his automatic return to established patterns demonstrates just how deeply entrenched paradigms become in our neural pathways and habitual responses. Even moments of clarity can be quickly overridden by the programming of decades. Yet, as the dentist's experience showed, there's very little that can be done (at least on the collective level). That is perhaps the most inconvenient thing to acknowledge. It showcased what happens when a paradigm is already entrenched within the cellular memory and hasn't been critically examined for over 150 years.

You see, the fragmentation we've developed fails to recognize connections between interconnected phenomena (pandemics, wars, schism, social unrest, economic instability, etc.), instead seeing each as isolated and independent. As I will demonstrate, false paradigms embedded in our collective consciousness inevitably manifest the very conditions we observe in the world—conditions we mistakenly attribute to external forces beyond our control.

This misattribution not only allows us to avoid personal responsibility but perpetuates these false patterns, enabling them to continue unchecked and unchallenged. Our reluctance to critically examine these inherited beliefs ensures we remain trapped in cycles of our own unconscious undoing.

A Roadmap to Synthesis: Where We're Heading

This thesis takes a different path than the convention. While I will touch on historical evidence, my primary appeal is to your innate capacity for common sense. I believe the invalidity of Germ Theory can be demonstrated through simple deductive reasoning that requires no specialized education, diplomas, or scholarly background. This approach is accessible to anyone willing to examine inherited paradigms with fresh eyes.

I have always endeavored to and felt that the job wasn't complete unless I'd be able to bridge the mystical and the scientific. Since I now have all the bits and pieces of the puzzle in place, I can once and for all attempt to coalesce these different worlds into one synthesized thesis.

Since this cannot be done in one post, this thesis is divided into several parts. Each would merit its own post, released throughout the coming weeks:

• Part I: Origins and Historical Context – In this first part we will begin our exploration of the the underlying mechanisms that created the Germ Theory paradigm, coupled with historical evidence. This will give us our bearings. It will establish a context and continuity and reveal where the dilemma really lies.

• Part II: Unintended Consequences – In the following post, we will explore the profound and often devastating outcomes that result from clinging to the Germ Theory paradigm despite contrary evidence.

• Part III: A Holistic Alternative – In the third post I'm going to offer a comprehensive model of health and disease transmission that aligns with nature's laws, offering a viable alternative to the contagion model.

• Part IV: Design Systems and Life Origins – In the fourth post I'm will be connecting Human Design System insights with Terrain Theory, demonstrating how the design of the inanimate is the foundation of life, and revealing how Germ Theory and Darwinism work in tandem to obscure our understanding of evolution.

• Part V: Esoteric Dimensions and Hidden Knowledge – In the final post, I will decode the symbolic language in the Book of Genesis to reveal a hidden model of creation that correlates with both Human Design System revelations and Terrain Theory principles, completing our holistic understanding. This will be the most challenging thing for me to accomplish.

At that moment our exploration will be complete. We would be able to merge everything into a whole, and see that the origin of life is not something distant of the past, but something that happens moment by moment, just like the compost or the banana peel I was bewildered with. The aim is to converge the mystical, the symbolic, the logical and scientific and by that, reveal that they are all reversed mirrors of the same underlying principle.

Throughout this series, I invite you on a journey that not only exposes why the Germ Theory fails as a paradigm but also illuminates the broader consequences of uncritically accepting inherited frameworks.

As we journey through these posts together, I encourage you to reflect on your own relationship with these concepts. How might the Germ Theory paradigm influence your everyday decisions about health? What would it mean if the fundamental assumptions about disease and contagion that we've inherited were fundamentally flawed?

These are questions worth pondering as we move forward.